Planning appeal decision
Small Holding 1, Opposite Northwood Hills United Reform Church, Joel Street, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 1NL
Planning appeal 3297631 at Small Holding 1, Opposite Northwood Hills United Reform Church, Joel Street, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 1NL (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 14 July 2022 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with particular regard to the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
construction of a single storey building to house a dog grooming centre
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Caines A
- Postcode
- HA6 1NL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with particular regard to the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would result in a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development, constituting inappropriate development for which very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy G2 of the London Plan 2021Policy DMEI4 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 Development Management Policies (2020)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 147Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed15 September 20266010520Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
- Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
- Dismissed20 June 20253355798Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
- Allowed21 February 20253341154Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
- Dismissed1 November 20243345366Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®