Planning appeal decision
Land to the West of St Annes Drive and South of London Road, Wokingham, RG40 1PB
Planning appeal 3297645 at Land to the West of St Annes Drive and South of London Road, Wokingham, RG40 1PB (Wokingham Borough Council) was allowed on 20 December 2022 by Inspector Jenkins I, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Green Route and local area, with reference to protected trees, amongst other matters.
the erection of 54 units (including 19 affordable homes) with associated access road from St Anne’s Drive, landscaping and open space
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jenkins I
- Postcode
- RG40 1PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Green Route and local area, with reference to protected trees, amongst other matters
- The effect of the proposal on the Spatial Development Strategy for the area, with particular reference to the separation between Wokingham and Bracknell
- The effect on the supply of Affordable Housing and housing land
- Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for infrastructure, on and off-site services, amenities and financial contributions to mitigate the impacts of the development on the local area
- The planning balance
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply triggered the tilted balance, under which the limited identified harms did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, particularly the affordable housing provision.
The significant weight given to affordable housing provision, moderate weight to the housing land supply contribution and limited weight to economic benefits outweighed the limited weight attached to harm to the Green Route/local character and to the Spatial Development Strategy, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development tipped the balance in favour of the proposal despite conflict with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- MDD Policy TB21MDD Policy CC03CS Policy CP21CS Policy CP11MDD Policy CC02CS Policy CP5MDD Policy TB05CS Policy CP2CS Policy CP4CS Policy CP17CS Policy CP8SEP Policy NRM6MDD Policy TB23CS Policy CP1CS Policy CP3CS Policy CP6CS Policy CP7CS Policy CP10MDD Policy CC01
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 56Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- Baroness Cumberlege of Newick and another v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2018] EWCA Civ 1305; Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and another, Richborough Estates Partnership LLP and another v Cheshire East Borough Council [2017] UKSC 37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 July 20266008845Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
- Allowed8 June 20263371069Land North of Reading Road, Arborfield, RG2 9HN
- Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
- Notice upheld10 March 20263374730Land at Gravelley Bridge Farm, Grazeley Green Road, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LG
- Dismissed9 March 20263361360Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®