Planning appeal decision
126 Billesley Lane, Moseley, B13 9RD
Planning appeal 3298041 at 126 Billesley Lane, Moseley, B13 9RD (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 13 January 2023 by Inspector Hall R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the condition restricting opening hours is reasonable and necessary in the interests of protecting the living conditions of nearby occupants, with particular regard to noise and disturbance.
demolition of existing single storey outbuilding, erection of single and two-storey extensions to side and rear, to extend the existing retail unit and provide a new shop front, provide a new retail unit, provide security shutters to both retail units and provide two first-floor flats without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2014/03677/PA, dated 21 August 2014
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hall R
- Postcode
- B13 9RD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the condition restricting opening hours is reasonable and necessary in the interests of protecting the living conditions of nearby occupants, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- Whether the condition restricting opening hours is reasonable and necessary in the interests of highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision
What decided it
The existing opening hours condition is reasonable and necessary to protect the living conditions of nearby residential occupants from unacceptable noise and disturbance in a predominantly residential context.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy DM2Policy DM6Policy TP44Policy DM14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 81Paragraph 111Paragraph 185
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed21 October 20266012934157, Somerford Road, Birmingham, B29 5LB
- Dismissed20 October 20266011877248 Wheelwright Rd, Erdington, Birmingam, B24 8EH
- Allowed6 October 2026600642839 Gladstone Road, Sparkbrook, Birmingham, B11 1LP
- Allowed17 September 20266009473Unit 9a, Bikdale Avenue, Birmingham, B29 6UB
- Dismissed11 September 2026601108812 Sladefield Road, Ward End, Birmingham, B83NX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®