Planning appeal decision
1 Essex Mansions, Essex Road South, Leytonstone, E11 1JP
Planning appeal 3298059 at 1 Essex Mansions, Essex Road South, Leytonstone, E11 1JP (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 July 2023 by Inspector Bristow T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effects of the proposal on character and appearance.
described on the application form as ‘erection of an additional storey to provide five new flats
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Bristow T
- Postcode
- E11 1JP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Effects of the proposal on character and appearance
- Effects on the living conditions of neighbours with particular regard to privacy
- Effects on daylight and sunlight
- Whether the proposal would afford appropriate living conditions for future occupants, with particular reference to internal space, waste and cycle provision
- Whether appropriate provision is, or could, be made for associated parking implications
What decided it
The proposed balconies would be incongruous features out of keeping with the prevailing character of the area and would result in undue loss of privacy to neighbouring occupants, conflicting with development plan policies and NPPF paragraph 130 on design and amenity.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Strategy policy CS2Core Strategy policy CS6Core Strategy policy CS7Core Strategy policy CS13Core Strategy policy CS15DPD policy DM4DPD policy DM7DPD policy DM16DPD policy DM29DPD policy DM32London Plan policy D3London Plan policy D6London Plan policy H1London Plan policy T5London Plan policy T6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 68Paragraph 74Paragraph 120Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed28 September 20266011324L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
- Dismissed18 September 20266011375Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
- Allowed21 July 202660069278 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS
- Allowed16 July 2026600750038 Second Avenue, Walthamstow, London, E17 9QH
- Dismissed22 May 2026600313652 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®