Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 August 20223298120

12 Church Street, Quainton, AYLESBURY, HP22 4AP

single storey side and rear extensions

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Griffiths S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposals on the character and appearance of the Quainton Conservation Area

What decided it

The flat-roofed rear extension would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Quainton Conservation Area and non-designated heritage asset, and the private benefits to the appellant's family do not constitute public benefits sufficient to outweigh this harm under NPPF paragraph 202.

Framework references: 202, 203

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy BE2, Policy E1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.