Planning appeal decision
66A Rook Lane, Chaldon, CR3 5AD
Planning appeal 3298141 at 66A Rook Lane, Chaldon, CR3 5AD (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 4 December 2024 by Inspector Brownless E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A: whether the Council's decision to refuse a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded.
‘extension to hardstanding and internal and external alterations to building’
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Not Applicable
- Inspector
- Brownless E
- Postcode
- CR3 5AD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A: whether the Council's decision to refuse a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded
- Appeal B (hardstanding): whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt; the effect on openness of the Green Belt; the effect on living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with regard to noise and disturbance; whether harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations
- Appeal B (internal and external alterations): whether the variation of Condition 2 of the 2019 Permission is reasonable and necessary; whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt; the effect on openness of the Green Belt; whether harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations
What decided it
For Appeal A: the absence of a functional relationship between the proposed ancillary uses and the primary garage/workshop use meant the activities would constitute a primary use in their own right, requiring planning permission. For Appeal B (hardstanding): the substantial harm to Green Belt openness and neighbouring living conditions through noise and disturbance, with no very special circumstances to outweigh this harm. For Appeal B (alterations): the alterations did not result in disproportionate additions as the external footprint and volume remained unchanged, falling within the paragraph 154(c) exception.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP7Policy CSP18
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 90Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®