®Planning appeal decision
Leger Lakes Stables, East Field Lane, Laughton, Rotherham, S25 1ZY
Planning appeal 3298157 at Leger Lakes Stables, East Field Lane, Laughton, Rotherham, S25 1ZY (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 October 2022 by Inspector Hendley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan policy (Appeals A and C).
Re – Proposed replacement animal shelter and store at Ledger Lakes, The Stables, Eastfield Lane, Laughton en le Morthen S25 1ZY for Mr M. Wheeler
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Hendley D
- Postcode
- S25 1ZY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposals would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan policy (Appeals A and C)
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area (Appeals A, B and C)
- the effect on highway safety, in particular for pedestrians (Appeal A)
- if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development (Appeal C)
- if harm arises, whether this is outweighed by the benefits of the proposals (Appeals A and B)
What decided it
For Appeals A and B, the unacceptable effects on character and appearance and (for A) highway safety are not outweighed by moderate economic benefits; for Appeal C, the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness is not clearly outweighed by animal welfare considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS4SP2SP6CS28SP55
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 148Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Rotherham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed27 October 20266011173Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
- Dismissed5 June 20266004041Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
- Dismissed9 February 202660013588 Grange Gardens, Todwick, Rotherham, S26 1JR
- Dismissed30 September 202533714235 Turnshaw Road, Ulley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 3YG
- Allowed30 September 20253371303Lynncroft Bungalow, Hard Lane, Kiveton Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 6RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.