Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 August 20233298173

Oakside Lodge, Upper Harbledown, Canterbury, CT2 9AX

Planning appeal 3298173 at Oakside Lodge, Upper Harbledown, Canterbury, CT2 9AX (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 17 August 2023 by Inspector Thompson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character, appearance and beauty of the site and its surroundings, including upon the setting of the Upper Harbledown Conservation Area and the Area of High Landscape Value.

Retrospective Tree House – with one bed / living space and shower / wc

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Thompson P
Postcode
CT2 9AX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character, appearance and beauty of the site and its surroundings, including upon the setting of the Upper Harbledown Conservation Area and the Area of High Landscape Value
  • The ecology of the Blean Woods, Harbledown to Dunkirk Local Wildlife Site; ancient woodland; and the integrity of the features of European nature conservation sites situated at Stodmarsh

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the Conservation Area and Area of High Landscape Value, assessed as less than substantial, could not be justified by the limited public benefits offered by the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DBE3Policy HE1Policy HE6Policy LB2Policy LB7Policy LB9Policy HE13Policy LB10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 180Paragraph 197Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Canterbury City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed26 March 20263374468
    The Orchard Marley Lane, Kingston, Kent, CT4 6JH
  2. Dismissed5 August 20253361209
    82 South Street, Whitstable, Kent, CT5 3EA
  3. Dismissed24 July 20253358713
    Toilet Block, Beach Court Residential Park, Faversham Road, Whitstable, Kent, CT5 4FE
  4. Allowed30 June 20253356594
    13 Orchard Street, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 8AP
  5. Dismissed14 October 20243333667
    Braggs Lane Farm, Braggs Lane, Herne Bay, Kent, CT6 7NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.