Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 January 20233298274

The Old Stable, 1 Bridle Lane , Twickenham , TW1 3EG

Planning appeal 3298274 at The Old Stable, 1 Bridle Lane , Twickenham , TW1 3EG (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 26 January 2023 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Crown Road St Margaret's Conservation Area CA49.

a new slate clad pitch roof to replace an existing flat roof without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 21/0406/FUL, dated 23 September 2021

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Williams K
Postcode
TW1 3EG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area, including whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Crown Road St Margaret's Conservation Area CA49
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties, with particular regard to privacy and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal would cause material harm to both the character and appearance of the conservation area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of privacy and disturbance, with insufficient public benefits to justify the harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

492 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266011219
    10 Water Lane, Richmond, TW9 1TJ
  2. Dismissed28 July 20266006160
    Tearfund, 100, Church Road, Teddington, TW11 8QE, 100, Church Road, Teddington,, TW11 8QE
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 March 20263342486
    50 Staines Rd, Twickenham, TW2 5AH
  4. Allowed26 February 20266000623
    The Duke Of Clarence, 147 High Street, Hampton Hill,, Hampton,, TW12 1NJ
  5. Dismissed29 December 20253358041
    Grosvenor Garage , Fitzgerald Avenue, East Sheen , London , SW14 8SZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.