Planning appeal decision
Land East Of Aldridge Court Nursing Home, Stables, Little Aston Road , Aldridge, WS9 0NN
Planning appeal 3298330 at Land East Of Aldridge Court Nursing Home, Stables, Little Aston Road , Aldridge, WS9 0NN (Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 February 2023 by Inspector Smith H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
demolition of the existing stable block and redevelopment of the site to provide one dwellinghouse and associated works
- Authority
- Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Smith H
- Postcode
- WS9 0NN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether or not the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Aldridge Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the non-designated heritage asset Aldridge Court
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, whether this would amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and heritage setting were not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of a single dwelling, and the Green Belt harm provided a clear reason for refusal that engaged the exception in paragraph 11d) of the Framework.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and permanence and the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and heritage setting were not outweighed by the limited weight attributable to the provision of one dwelling and modest economic benefits, and the Green Belt harm provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11d) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ENV2Policy ENV3Policy GP2Policy ENV32Policy DW3Policy ENV27Policy T4Policy GB1Policy 3.2Policy 3.5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 202Paragraph 203
- Judgments
- R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020]; Timmins v Gedling Borough Council [2014]; Turner v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2016] EWCA Civ 466
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Walsall
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed9 October 20266012207Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
- Dismissed11 August 20266008451251 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Walsall, B74 2DX
- Notice varied and upheld20 February 20263344208National Car Hub, Land Situated to the South and East of Back Lane, Aldridge, Walsall, WS9 0LS
- Allowed9 December 20253334991Paddock Land Corner Of Beacon Road, Bridle Lane, Walsall, Streetly, WS9 0RG
- Allowed9 May 20253358297197 Aldridge Road, Streetly, Sutton Coldfield, B74 3YR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®