Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 October 20233298478

Land to rear of 9 - 16 Sturt Avenue, Camelsdale, Lynchmere, West Sussex, GU27 3SJ

9 dwellinghouses together with associated access, infrastructure, parking, and landscaping. Appeal B: APP/L3815/W/23/3318265 Land north of Sturt Avenue, Haslemere, West Sussex GU27 3SJ

Authority
Chichester District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Webb B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed developments in relation to flood risk
  • the effects of the proposed developments on biodiversity
  • the effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the scheme subject of Appeal A would provide an appropriate mix of dwellings

What decided it

The appellant's failure to apply and satisfy the sequential test for flood risk in relation to Appeal A provided a clear reason for refusal that outweighed the housing benefits.

the limited contribution towards addressing housing need would not outweigh the harm identified in relation to flood risk and biodiversity

Framework references: 62

Plan policies cited: Policy 42, Policy 45, Policy 25, Policy 48, Policy 33, Policy 49, Policy 52, Policy RE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.