Planning appeal decision
Land to Rear of 9 - 16 Sturt Avenue, Camelsdale, Lynchmere, West Sussex, GU27 3SJ
Planning appeal 3298478 at Land to Rear of 9 - 16 Sturt Avenue, Camelsdale, Lynchmere, West Sussex, GU27 3SJ (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2023 by Inspector Webb B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed developments in relation to flood risk.
9 dwellinghouses together with associated access, infrastructure, parking, and landscaping. Appeal B: APP/L3815/W/23/3318265 Land north of Sturt Avenue, Haslemere, West Sussex GU27 3SJ
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Webb B
- Postcode
- GU27 3SJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed developments in relation to flood risk
- the effects of the proposed developments on biodiversity
- the effect of the proposed developments on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the scheme subject of Appeal A would provide an appropriate mix of dwellings
What decided it
The appellant's failure to apply and satisfy the sequential test for flood risk in relation to Appeal A provided a clear reason for refusal that outweighed the housing benefits.
the limited contribution towards addressing housing need would not outweigh the harm identified in relation to flood risk and biodiversity
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 42Policy 45Policy 25Policy 48Policy 33Policy 49Policy 52Policy RE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 62
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed23 October 20266009623Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
- Dismissed15 October 20266010948Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
- Dismissed5 October 202660118508 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
- Dismissed2 October 202660116151, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
- Allowed30 September 20266014666Lerryn, West Strand, West Wittering, Chichester, PO20 8AU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®