Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 August 20223298681

Neyland Court, Pembroke Road, Ruislip , HA4 8NQ

Planning appeal 3298681 at Neyland Court, Pembroke Road, Ruislip , HA4 8NQ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 24 August 2022 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposals on the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 4, 6, 6a and 8 Brickwall Lane with particular reference to outlook and sunlight.

construction of detached building to accommodate new management office accommodation above replacement parking spaces

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Walker R
Postcode
HA4 8NQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposals on the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 4, 6, 6a and 8 Brickwall Lane with particular reference to outlook and sunlight
  • The effects of the proposals on the living conditions of occupiers of flats within Neyland Court with particular reference to outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance and loss of external amenity space
  • The effects of the proposals on the living conditions of the occupier of No 19 Pembroke Road with particular reference to outlook

What decided it

The unacceptable harmful effects on the living conditions of occupiers of Nos 6 and 6a Brickwall Lane and the flats at Neyland Court, particularly regarding outlook, sunlight, privacy and loss of external amenity space, conflicted with Policy DMHB 11 and paragraph 130 of the NPPF with no material considerations to outweigh that conflict.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMHB 11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

389 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011516
    73 High Street, Ruislip, HA4 8JB
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266010520
    Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266008246
    21 Green Lane, Hillingdon, Uxbridge, UB8 3ED
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266004329
    14 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.