Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20233298695

Twickenham Road, Richmond Upon Thames

Planning appeal 3298695 at Twickenham Road, Richmond Upon Thames (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 June 2023 by Inspector Spencer-Peet A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to Metropolitan Open Land (MOL), the significance of the Old Deer Park Conservation Area (the Conservation Area), the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew World Heritage Site, and nearby Listed Buildings.

for the installation of a 10m black monopole with tri - antenna with 2 equipment cabinets and associated ancillary works thereto

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Spencer-Peet A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to Metropolitan Open Land (MOL), the significance of the Old Deer Park Conservation Area (the Conservation Area), the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew World Heritage Site, and nearby Listed Buildings
  • The effect of the siting of the development on biodiversity
  • Whether appropriate consultation has been carried out

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets (Conservation Area, World Heritage Site buffer zone, and setting of Twickenham Bridge) was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, particularly given the appellant's failure to demonstrate that this was the most suitable siting option.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP6Policy LP13Policy LP15Policy LP16Policy LP33Policy HC1Policy HC2Policy G3Policy G6Policy G7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 117Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

434 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed14 January 20266000266
    Grass Verge Tangley Park Road, Hampton, Twickenham, TW12 3YH
  2. Allowed5 September 20243325307
    Pavement Outside 27F The Quadrant , Richmond, TW9 1DN
  3. Dismissed1 May 20243328374
    Richmond Telephone Exchange, Sheen Road, London, TW9 1LW
  4. Dismissed12 March 20243325555
    Pavement O/S 38 George Street, Richmond, TW9 1HY
  5. Allowed2 January 20243323123
    Area of Grass Verge, Montrose Avenue, Hospital Bridge Road Twickenham , Middlesex, TW2 6LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.