Planning appeal decision
Land at Broyle Gate Farm, Lewes Road, Ringmer, East Sussex, BN8 5NA
Planning appeal 3298993 at Land at Broyle Gate Farm, Lewes Road, Ringmer, East Sussex, BN8 5NA (Lewes District Council) was allowed on 21 November 2022 by Inspector Cliff D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal accords with the spatial strategy as set out in the development plan.
up to 100 residential dwellings (40% affordable) and the provision of community facilities to include an artificial turf football pitch, tennis courts, cricket nets, outdoor gym, play area, skate park, parking area and public open space
- Authority
- Lewes District Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Cliff D
- Postcode
- BN8 5NA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal accords with the spatial strategy as set out in the development plan
- The effect of the proposed development on the landscape, character and appearance of the area, including with regard to the setting of the SDNP and the settlements of Ringmer and Broyle Side
- The effect on the significance of (a) the nearby Grade II listed buildings, 'Broyle Gate Farmhouse' (Ref: 1238588) and 'Former Farm Buildings to the north and northeast of Broyle Gate Farmhouse' (Ref: 1238592) and (b) the non-designated heritage asset 'Little Thatch Cottage'
- The acceptability of the sports and recreational facilities proposed as part of the development, including with regard to Policy 7.4 of the Ringmer Neighbourhood Plan
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance, under which the substantial housing and affordable housing benefits outweighed the identified landscape, heritage and policy conflict harms.
The substantial benefits of up to 100 dwellings (40% affordable) and significant benefits from funded sports and recreation facilities, together with moderate economic and biodiversity benefits, outweighed the moderate landscape and visual harm, the less than substantial heritage harm to designated assets, modest harm to a non-designated heritage asset, and limited conflict with the spatial strategy and Policy 7.4, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1Policy SP2Policy 6.4Policy 4.1Policy 6.3Core Policy 10Policy DM25Policy 4.11Policy 4.2Core Policy 11Policy DM33Policy 4.7Policy 7.4Policy DM15Policy CP14Policy 8.1Policy 8.4Policy DM22Policy 8.11Policy 8.7Policy 5.4Policy CP10Policy DM24Policy 4.10Policy CP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 95Paragraph 134Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lewes District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed6 October 20266005671Land South of Green Road, Wivelsfield Green, RH17 7QL
- Allowed9 April 20263373143The Old Mill Bungalow Barcombe Mills, Barcombe, Lewes, BN8 5BS
- Allowed8 December 2025337331449 Station Road, Newhaven, BN9 0NN
- Dismissed24 October 20253365121Clayhill Woods, Isfield Road, Ringmer, East Sussex, BN8 5RP
- Dismissed24 October 20253365120Clayhill Woods, Isfield Road, Ringmer, East Sussex, BN8 5RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®