Planning appeal decision
Oakwood Chertsey Road, Windlesham, GU20 6HY
Planning appeal 3299190 at Oakwood Chertsey Road, Windlesham, GU20 6HY (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 May 2023 by Inspector Simpson V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the ‘use of land for sitting of 2 tents for camping (for use by occupants of Oakwood) associated area of decking with pedestrian access from neighbouring Oakwood
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Simpson V
- Postcode
- GU20 6HY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to trees
- the effect of the development on biodiversity
- if the proposal is found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal reduces Green Belt openness and conflicts with the purpose of safeguarding countryside from encroachment, constituting inappropriate development for which no very special circumstances exist to justify approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy DM9Policy CP14A
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 149Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed18 September 202660121062 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Dismissed1 May 20263376162Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
- Allowed17 April 20263374712Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
- Dismissed30 March 20263374826Land to the West of 35 Mincing Lane, Chobham, Woking, Surrey, GU24 8RS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®