Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision18 July 20233299233

Workshop Rear of 8 High Street, Hampton, TW12 2SJ

Planning appeal 3299233 at Workshop Rear of 8 High Street, Hampton, TW12 2SJ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 18 July 2023 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the details submitted in relation to the relevant conditions are acceptable having regard to the character and appearance of the area, including the conservation area and the setting of listed buildings, and the provision of cycle storage.

the conversion and extension of workshop building Use Class E(g) - light industrial (formerly B1c and B1a lightl) to form a one-storey, 3 bedroom dwelling with accommodation in the roof Use Class C3 residential

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
TW12 2SJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the details submitted in relation to the relevant conditions are acceptable having regard to the character and appearance of the area, including the conservation area and the setting of listed buildings, and the provision of cycle storage

What decided it

The use of UPVC for windows, doors, gutters, downpipes, soffits and fascias throughout the property appears overtly modern and fails to reflect the predominant traditional nature and detailing of the immediate surrounds within the conservation area and setting of listed buildings.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP39Policy LP44

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

283 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  3. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  4. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.