Planning appeal decision
Land to Rear of 318-326 Brook Lane, Billesley , Birmingham, West Midlands, B13 0TH
Planning appeal 3299527 at Land to Rear of 318-326 Brook Lane, Billesley , Birmingham, West Midlands, B13 0TH (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 28 December 2022 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
outline application for the erection of 3 dwellings with all matters reserved except for access and layout
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Stephens K
- Postcode
- B13 0TH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposal on pedestrian and vehicle safety with regard to the access and parking
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing occupants of neighbouring properties with particular regard to outlook
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing occupants of neighbouring properties with particular regard to privacy
- Whether the proposal amounts to a poor setting and unsafe environment
What decided it
The harm to character and appearance caused by overdevelopment and contrived layout, combined with fundamental unsuitability of the access arrangements for highway and pedestrian safety, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of three dwellings even under the tilted balance.
The public benefits of three dwellings would be significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harm to character and appearance, harm to pedestrian and vehicular safety and poor quality of layout, even applying the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d) due to lack of five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy TP44Policy DM14Policy DM15Policy DM2Policy TP27
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed11 September 202660091331 Westwood Road, Birmingham, B6 7DX
- Dismissed9 September 20266008724538-540 Stratford Road, Sparkhill, Birmingham, B11 4AL
- Dismissed11 August 20266007228168 Adderley Road, Birmingham, B8 1EH
- Dismissed30 June 20266002364807 Pershore Road, Selly Park, Birmingham, B29 7LR
- Dismissed24 June 202660068722-2a Beauchamp Avenue, Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, B20 1DR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®