Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 November 20223299624

Bordesley Green, Birmingham, B9 5PQ

16.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Stephens K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties with particular regard to outlook
  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on nearby nursery schools
  • If any harm would occur whether this is outweighed by the needs for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative sites

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the monopole would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of nearby occupiers, and the appellant failed to demonstrate that suitable alternative sites had been properly considered.

Framework references: 117a

Plan policies cited: DMB Policy DM16, BDP Policy TP27, BDP Policy PG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.