Bordesley Green, Birmingham, B9 5PQ

Planning appeal 3299624 at Bordesley Green, Birmingham, B9 5PQ (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 24 November 2022 by Inspector Stephens K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

16.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority: Birmingham City Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector: Stephens K
Postcode: B9 5PQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby properties with particular regard to outlook
The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on nearby nursery schools
If any harm would occur whether this is outweighed by the needs for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternative sites

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the monopole would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and to the living conditions of nearby occupiers, and the appellant failed to demonstrate that suitable alternative sites had been properly considered.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: DMB Policy DM16BDP Policy TP27BDP Policy PG3
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 117a

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

59 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed23 March 20263376018
Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 8HW
Dismissed23 March 20263375839
Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham
Dismissed23 March 20263375725
Footpath Outside 86C Old Snow Hill, Birmingham, B4 6HW
Dismissed28 August 20253365270
Stratford Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 9EF
Allowed22 August 20253366060
Jamia Masjid Haroonia, 766 Alum Rock Road, Birmingham, B8 3PX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.