Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 July 20223299734

242 Northwood Road , Harefield , UB9 6PU

front wall, pillars, and gate (retrospective)

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Bowyer J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on pedestrian and highway safety

What decided it

The proposal causes unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area through its height, materials and visual prominence, and increases potential for highway safety conflicts through reduced visibility, neither of which is justified by the appellant's security and safety arguments.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 – Strategic Policies 2012, Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMHB 14 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMEI 6 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020, Policy DMT2 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 2 – Development Management Policies 2020

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.