Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20223299813

63 Dome Hill, CATERHAM, CR3 6EF

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Naylor R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effects of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and character, and the identified considerations do not amount to very special circumstances sufficient to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 149, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP7, Policy DP9, Policy CSP18

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.