63 Dome Hill, Caterham, CR3 6EF

Planning appeal 3299813 at 63 Dome Hill, Caterham, CR3 6EF (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2022 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies.

Proposed brick piers and entrance gates

Authority: Tandridge District Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: other · Householder developments
Inspector: Naylor R
Postcode: CR3 6EF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2021 and any relevant development plan policies
The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
The effects of the development on the character and appearance of the area
Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and character, and the identified considerations do not amount to very special circumstances sufficient to outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy DP10Policy DP7Policy DP9Policy CSP18
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 149Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

83 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed29 October 20266006369
Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
Dismissed14 October 20266008351
Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
Dismissed13 October 20266007518
Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
Dismissed23 September 20266008688
Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
Dismissed22 September 20266011736
Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.