Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 November 20223299815

Land at Bramley Road, Silchester, Hampshire, RG7 2LX

erection of 1no dwelling to replace existing stables

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Parker R
Postcode
RG7 2LX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is a suitable location for housing, having regard to the development plan and other material considerations

What decided it

The proposal would create an isolated form of development contrary to paragraph 80 of the Framework, and the modest housing benefits do not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the adverse impacts of poor access to services and facilities and unsustainable patterns of growth.

The modest benefits of a single dwelling and limited economic benefits were outweighed by the harm arising from poor access to services and facilities and the conflict with sustainable development objectives, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

Framework references: 80, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS6

Judgments cited: Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHLG and others [2021] EWCA Civ 320

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.