Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20223299849

Land Adjacent to Amersham Road and Minerva Way, Beaconsfield, HP9 2RJ

Planning appeal 3299849 at Land Adjacent to Amersham Road and Minerva Way, Beaconsfield, HP9 2RJ (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was dismissed on 20 December 2022 by Inspector Rose D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

Outline application with all matters reserved except access for the erection of residential dwellings including affordable housing (Use Class C3), new vehicular access points off Amersham Road and the Eastern Relief Road, a local centre including a community building (Use Classes E(a)(b)(c)(d)(e), F1(d)(e), F2(a)(b) and C3), a primary school and pre-school (Use Classes E(f) and F1(a)), public open space and associated infrastructure

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Rose D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the landscape and visual impacts of the proposed development, including its influence on the landscape setting of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • whether the proposal would result in a well-designed place, with particular reference to the illustrative Masterplan and parameter details of layout, land use, building heights, building density, movement and access, and green and blue infrastructure, in the context of its interface with existing townscape, movement corridors and open land uses
  • the impacts of the proposed development on European Protected Sites and Species; non-European Protected Reptiles; and badgers taking account of intended mitigation/offsetting measures and proposals for Biodiversity Net Gain
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with landscape/design harm and ecological harm, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.

The substantial weight attaching to Green Belt harm, together with significant harm from poor design at key interfaces and habitat fragmentation, was not clearly outweighed by the very significant benefits of market and affordable housing, self-build provision, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits, so the balance tipped against the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy EP3Policy EP4Policy EP6Policy H9Core Policy 1Core Policy 3Core Policy 5Core Policy 7Core Policy 9Core Policy 13Core Policy 14Policy TR5Policy COM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 125Paragraph 130Paragraph 179Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

46 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251
    Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263347247
    Small Acres Farm, Stoke Common Road, Fulmer , Buckinghamshire , SL3 6HA
  3. Allowed29 May 20263376692
    Boveney Court Farm Boveney Road, Dorney, Windsor, Buckinghamshire , SL4 6QG
  4. Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263376465
    Land at Denham Mount Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
  5. Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263364195
    Denham Mount, Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.