Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 April 20233299865

Area of Footpath to the Front of Leeson House, Richmond Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 2NJ

Planning appeal 3299865 at Area of Footpath to the Front of Leeson House, Richmond Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 2NJ (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2023 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives.

the installation of a 15-metre-high monopole, 4 no. equipment cabinets and development work ancillary thereto

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Tucker A
Postcode
TW1 3AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives.

What decided it

The appellant failed to robustly justify the proposed siting by properly considering alternative sites and solutions, and the harm to character and appearance and conservation area setting was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP8Policy LP13Policy LP14Policy LP16Policy LP33
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 114Paragraph 117Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

475 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed14 January 20266000266
    Grass Verge Tangley Park Road, Hampton, Twickenham, TW12 3YH
  2. Allowed5 September 20243325307
    Pavement Outside 27F The Quadrant , Richmond, TW9 1DN
  3. Dismissed1 May 20243328374
    Richmond Telephone Exchange, Sheen Road, London, TW9 1LW
  4. Dismissed12 March 20243325555
    Pavement O/S 38 George Street, Richmond, TW9 1HY
  5. Allowed2 January 20243323123
    Area of Grass Verge, Montrose Avenue, Hospital Bridge Road Twickenham , Middlesex, TW2 6LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.