Planning appeal decision
Clarence House West Common, HARPENDEN, AL5 2AR
the erection of a new four-bedroom detached dwelling
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to relevant development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt contrary to Framework paragraph 149 and local policy, and the limited benefits of a single dwelling do not amount to very special circumstances to justify it.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness outweighed the limited social and economic benefits of building a single dwelling, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply due to Green Belt protection policies providing clear reasons for refusal.
Framework references: 149, 138, 11
Plan policies cited: Policy 1 of the St Albans District Local Plan Review 1994
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®