Planning appeal decision
202 Radlett Road, Frogmore, St Albans, AL2 2EN
Planning appeal 6008445 at 202 Radlett Road, Frogmore, St Albans, AL2 2EN (St Albans City Council) was dismissed on 10 July 2026 by Inspector Andrew Phillips, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and relevant development plan policies.
Erection of six dwellings with associated landscaping, parking and access
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Andrew Phillips
- Postcode
- AL2 2EN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on trees, biodiversity, highway safety and the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 4 Acer Close, with particular reference to daylight, sunlight and outlook
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The site is not in a sustainable location as demonstrated by the below-average Connectivity Tool score and lack of safe pedestrian access to services and facilities, making the proposal inappropriate development in the Green Belt that cannot be justified by very special circumstances.
The limited housing supply and short-term economic benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness, moderate harm to openness, significant harm to highway safety, moderate harm to residential amenity, and potential significant harm to trees and protected species.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1Policy 34Policy 70Policy 74Policy 106Policy 36APolicy S6Policy S14Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy SP3Policy SP8Policy TRA1Policy LG5Policy DES1Policy NEB6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 142Paragraph 11Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in St Albans City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Planning permission granted15 September 20263311314Land at Former Butterfly World, Miriam Lane, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, AL2 3NY
- Planning permission granted8 July 2026337492139 The Broadway, Gustard Wood, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, AL4 9LW
- Notice upheld8 July 2026336000739 The Broadway, Wheathampstead, St. Albans, AL4 8LW
- Dismissed10 June 20266005367Beaumont Hall Lane, Redbourn Road, Redbourn, AL3 6RN
- Dismissed4 June 2026600373527 Highfield Road, Sandridge, AL4 9BX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®