122 Joel Lane, Hyde, Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, SK14 5LN

Planning appeal 3300122 at 122 Joel Lane, Hyde, Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, SK14 5LN (Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 September 2022 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

‘existing roof to be raised to create additional first floor space, rear extension, roof removed with new roof design added. New dormers added to the front elevation’

Authority: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Ollerenshaw M
Postcode: SK14 5LN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disproportionate addition to the original building in the Green Belt, and the harm caused is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to justify very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy OL2
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Dismissed12 May 20263376330
Land North Of Alney, Uplands Road, Hyde, Tameside, SK14 3AD
Dismissed22 April 20266004451
Parsonage Fields Farm, The Mudd, Hyde, Cheshire, British, SK14 6JN
Allowed29 October 20253367377
Taunton Brook Stables, Taunton Brook Lane, Ashton Under Lyne, OL7 9HZ
Dismissed8 August 20253362863
Carr House, 25 Carr Lane, Stalybridge, SK15 3NS
Dismissed8 July 20253360410
60 Mottram Moor, Hollingworth, Tamside, SK14 8LZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.