Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 September 20223300122

122 JOEL LANE, Hyde, Greater Manchester, Greater Manchester, SK14 5LN

‘existing roof to be raised to create additional first floor space, rear extension, roof removed with new roof design added. New dormers added to the front elevation’

Authority
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal would result in a disproportionate addition to the original building in the Green Belt, and the harm caused is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy OL2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.