Planning appeal decision
Holmbush Manor Farm, Hayes Lane, Slinfold, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 0SL
Planning appeal 3300138 at Holmbush Manor Farm, Hayes Lane, Slinfold, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 0SL (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2023 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is an appropriate location for dwellings by conversion of an existing building having regard to local and national planning policy for residential development.
conversion of existing stables into a new dwelling
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
- Postcode
- RH13 0SL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is an appropriate location for dwellings by conversion of an existing building having regard to local and national planning policy for residential development
- the effect of the proposal on the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar site having regard to water neutrality
What decided it
The proposal would significantly harm the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar site by failing to demonstrate water neutrality, and the site is not an appropriate location for residential development under the development plan's spatial strategy for rural areas.
Although the tilted balance under Framework paragraph 11(d) was engaged due to the Council's 4-year housing land supply, the clear reason for refusal relating to the protection of European protected sites removed the presumption in favour of sustainable development; the modest social, economic and environmental benefits of two dwellings were outweighed by the conflict with the development plan spatial strategy and the significant harm to the European protected sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 2Policy 3Policy 4Policy 26Policy 31Policy 33
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHLG and others [2021] EWCA Civ 320
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Dismissed19 October 20266007051Bentley House, North Heath Lane Industrial Estate, North Heath Lane, Horsham, RH12 5QE
- Dismissed15 October 20266012640The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
- Dismissed13 October 20266008205Barnards Nursery, Rock Road, Washington, RH20 3BH
- Allowed12 October 20266011680Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®