Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 May 20233300320

Land Rear of 23 Moorland Road, London, SW9 8UA

Planning appeal 3300320 at Land Rear of 23 Moorland Road, London, SW9 8UA (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 9 May 2023 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Loughborough Park Conservation Area and whether it would preserve the setting of the nearby listed building.

Construction of single storey dwelling (Class C3) with associated cycle parking, refuse storage and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
SW9 8UA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Loughborough Park Conservation Area and whether it would preserve the setting of the nearby listed building
  • the effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site with regard to provision for parking

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, particularly the disruption to the historic character and setting of the conservation area and listed building, was not outweighed by the limited public and heritage benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LLP Policy T3LLP Policy T1LLP Policy T6LLP Policy T6DLLP Policy T3HLLP Policy Q5LLP Policy Q20LLP Policy Q22LLP Policy Q14LLP Policy Q15LLP Policy D4LP Policy T6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

577 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009699
    28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.