Planning appeal decision
Whitwood Mere, Leeds Road, Castleford, West Yorkshire, WF10 1QR
Planning appeal 3300922 at Whitwood Mere, Leeds Road, Castleford, West Yorkshire, WF10 1QR (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 12 January 2023 by Inspector Wilson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
- Demolition of existing club house - Proposed extensions to existing sub-station - Erection of temporary mooring causeway
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Wilson L
- Postcode
- WF10 1PW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including an assessment of the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on flooding and drainage
- The effect of the proposal on ecology and biodiversity
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would not preserve openness, and the limited benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and other identified harms, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D24Policy D25Policy CS10Policy D8Policy D9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 174Paragraph 12Paragraph 13Paragraph 14Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
- Dismissed10 August 20266004277Land At Back Lane, Woolley, Wakefield, WF4 2JT
- Allowed10 July 20266006858Land at, Pontefract Road, Pontefract, WF11 8RJ
- Allowed2 July 20263368025Land South of Wakefield B Substation, And East of Neil Fox Way, Wakefield, WF1 5DB
- Dismissed30 June 20266005423Land off Lee Moor Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4EU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®