Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 February 20233300974

Amberley, Turnditch, Belper, DE56 2EA

2 detached dwellings

Authority
Amber Valley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Radcliffe I

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would accord with development plan policies relating to the location of development in the Borough
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal would not constitute infilling within the meaning of policy H4 and would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of Hillclifflane, contrary to the development plan taken as a whole, with insufficient material considerations to outweigh this conflict.

the limited benefits of supporting local services, windfall development and housing supply were insufficient to outweigh the harm caused to the spatial strategy for the area and to the character and appearance of the settlement, and non-compliance with the development plan

Framework references: 11, 15, 69, 79, 219

Plan policies cited: Policy H4, Policy LS1(c), Policy LS3(a), Policy LS3(c), Policy ENV7(d), Policy H1, Policy EN1, Policy H5, Policy TP1, Policy TP6, Policy L1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.