Planning appeal decision
Amberley, Turnditch, Belper, DE56 2EA
2 detached dwellings
- Authority
- Amber Valley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Radcliffe I
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would accord with development plan policies relating to the location of development in the Borough
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The proposal would not constitute infilling within the meaning of policy H4 and would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of Hillclifflane, contrary to the development plan taken as a whole, with insufficient material considerations to outweigh this conflict.
the limited benefits of supporting local services, windfall development and housing supply were insufficient to outweigh the harm caused to the spatial strategy for the area and to the character and appearance of the settlement, and non-compliance with the development plan
Framework references: 11, 15, 69, 79, 219
Plan policies cited: Policy H4, Policy LS1(c), Policy LS3(a), Policy LS3(c), Policy ENV7(d), Policy H1, Policy EN1, Policy H5, Policy TP1, Policy TP6, Policy L1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®