Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 January 20243300987

15, 16 and 17 Little Common, Stanmore, HA7 3BZ

Planning appeal 3300987 at 15, 16 and 17 Little Common, Stanmore, HA7 3BZ (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 9 January 2024 by Inspector Harding C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

1st floor rear extension to all 3 houses

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Harding C
Postcode
HA7 3BZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area including the Little Common Conservation Area
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The disproportionate scale of the extension (41.8% increase in floorspace, 65.7% in footprint, 52.6% in volume) combined with harm to Green Belt openness and the conservation area's character could not be justified by the limited public benefits offered.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM16Policy HC1Policy D3Policy CS1Policy DM1Policy DM7Policy G2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

227 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 May 20263376270
    43 Glanleam Road, Stanmore, HA7 4NW
  2. Split Decision29 April 20263325757
    16 Brookshill Avenue, Harrow, HA3 6RZ
  3. Dismissed11 December 20253365209
    St. Davids Pinner Hill, Pinner, HA5 3XU
  4. Dismissed15 October 20253369650
    Pinnerwood Cottage , Woodhall Road, Pinner, HA5 4UA
  5. Dismissed8 October 20253366146
    4, Mansion House Drive, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 3GA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.