Planning appeal decision
Land Rear of 15 Norwich Road, Ditchingham, Norfolk, NR35 2JL
Planning appeal 3301102 at Land Rear of 15 Norwich Road, Ditchingham, Norfolk, NR35 2JL (South Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 7 June 2023 by Inspector Berry A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
describes as the “erection of 3 bungalows, construction of new vehicular access
- Authority
- South Norfolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Berry A
- Postcode
- NR35 2JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular reference to noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the SPAs/SACs
- whether the site is in a suitable location for housing development, with particular reference to Policy DM1.3 of the South Norfolk Local Plan Development Management Policies Document, adopted 2015
- whether the site is in a suitable location for housing development, with particular reference to whether future occupiers would be reliant on the private car
What decided it
The proposal would harm the integrity of protected SPAs and SACs without proper mitigation, which provides a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework, and the identified harms to character and living conditions would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefits.
The moderate benefits of housing supply, economic and social benefits, and sustainable location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, unacceptable harm to living conditions of the host dwelling's occupiers, and likely significant effect on the integrity of SPAs and SACs without proper mitigation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1 JCSPolicy 2 JCSPolicy 6 JCSPolicy DM1.3 LPPolicy DM1.4(d)(i) LPPolicy DM3.8 LPPolicy DM3.10 LPPolicy DM3.13 LPPolicy DM4.4 LPPolicy DM4.5 LP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130Paragraph 105Paragraph 80Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- People Over Wind and Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta ECLI:EU:C:2018:244; Braintree District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Norfolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed14 April 20266004438Land At Downham Grove Industrial Estate, Downham Grove, Wymondham, Norfolk, NR18 0SN
- Dismissed1 October 20253365678Land West of Low Road, Wortwell, Norfolk, IP20 0HJ
- Allowed3 July 20253353472Land at The Loke, Costessey , Norfolk, NR5 0TD
- Dismissed6 November 20243324060Deal Farm Kenninghall Road, Bressingham, Diss, Norfolk, IP22 2HG
- Allowed30 October 20243335813Pied Bridge Farm, Burntoak Lane, Alburgh, Harleston, Norfolk, IP20 0DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®