Planning appeal decision
200 Sutherland Avenue, LONDON, W9 1RX
described on the application form as, “The proposal comprises of the installation of a roof light to the existing front light well, the replacement of existing planters and the installation of a painted hardwood bin store to the front garden
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on trees
What decided it
The conspicuous and stylistically incongruous appearance of the proposed glazed roof light would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the character and appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area and the significance of the non-designated heritage asset, which was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal.
Framework references: 203, 189
Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 34
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®