Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 May 20233301333

200 Sutherland Avenue, LONDON, W9 1RX

described on the application form as, “The proposal comprises of the installation of a roof light to the existing front light well, the replacement of existing planters and the installation of a painted hardwood bin store to the front garden

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on trees

What decided it

The conspicuous and stylistically incongruous appearance of the proposed glazed roof light would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the character and appearance of the Maida Vale Conservation Area and the significance of the non-designated heritage asset, which was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 203, 189

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.