Planning appeal decision
Site 46a010, Rear of 89-169 Tunnel Road, Galley Common Nuneaton, Warwickshire
Planning appeal 3301839 at Site 46a010, Rear of 89-169 Tunnel Road, Galley Common Nuneaton, Warwickshire (Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council) was dismissed on 11 November 2022 by Inspector Savage K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would represent a suitable location for housing, having regard to relevant local and national planning policy.
up to 70 dwellings with all matters reserved except for access
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Savage K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would represent a suitable location for housing, having regard to relevant local and national planning policy
- Whether the Council can demonstrate a five year supply of deliverable housing sites
- The effect of the proposal on the landscape character and appearance of the area, having regard in particular to the effect on non-designated heritage assets
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety, with reference in particular to: i. The capacity of the road network, and ii. The safety of the site access and parking arrangements
What decided it
The substantial harm to the non-designated heritage asset and significant harm to landscape character, combined with conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, outweighed the housing and other benefits even under the tilted balance.
The significant harm to landscape character and the non-designated heritage asset, together with conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy and limited highway harm, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing and other minor benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS3Policy BE3Policy BE4Policy HS2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 130Paragraph 174Paragraph 196Paragraph 203
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Nuneaton and Bedworth
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed26 February 20266001656Whitestone Dental Practice, 41 Lutterworth Road, Nuneaton, CV11 4LE
- Dismissed11 December 20243345621Witherley House, Hazell Way, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 7PQ
- Dismissed8 February 20243326895Land Adjacent 2 Lancing Road, Bulkington, Bedworth, CV12 9QU
- Allowed24 March 20223285261Camp Hill Dental Practice, 206 Camp Hill Road, Nuneaton, CV10 0JL
- Allowed6 January 20223277478Crystal Palace, Gadsby Street, Nuneaton, CV11 4PA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®