34 Kings Cross Lane, South Nutfield, Redhill, RH1 5NU

Planning appeal 3302129 at 34 Kings Cross Lane, South Nutfield, Redhill, RH1 5NU (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 21 December 2022 by Inspector Sabu R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Seven detached and semi-detached chalet bungalows to the rear of the existing property at 34 Kings Cross Lane with access to be determined and all other matters reserved

Authority: Tandridge District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Hearing
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Sabu R
Postcode: RH1 5NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
whether the proposal would provide a suitable living environment for future occupiers with regard to private amenity space
the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of No 34 Kings Cross Lane (No 34) with regard to outlook

What decided it

The severe housing land supply shortfall (1.8 years) engaged the tilted balance, which the limited and localised harm to character and appearance could not outweigh.

The moderate benefit of providing seven dwellings, together with social and economic benefits, outweighed the limited weight attributed to conflict with development plan policies on character and appearance, such that adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy CSP18Policy CSP21Policy DP7Policy DP12
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Tandridge District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

Allowed29 October 20266006369
Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
Dismissed26 October 20266014139
31a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
Dismissed15 October 20266005184
Streathbourne House, 75 Redehall Road, Smallfield, RH6 9QA
Dismissed14 October 20266008351
Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
Dismissed13 October 20266007518
Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.