Planning appeal decision
Chace Farm Stud, The Warren, Ashtead , Surrey, KT21 2SH
Planning appeal 3302971 at Chace Farm Stud, The Warren, Ashtead , Surrey, KT21 2SH (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 27 July 2023 by Inspector Glassar S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Demolition of existing buildings and development of an extra care facility (Use Class C2) comprising 10 self-contained units, office floorspace (Use Class E), parking, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- community-institutional · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Glassar S
- Postcode
- KT21 2SH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- whether the development would be in an appropriate location, with particular regard to local development strategies and accessibility to services, facilities and footpaths
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing supply of deliverable housing sites triggered the tilted balance under paragraph 11 of the Framework, and the benefits of meeting specialist Class C2 housing need for older people outweighed the locational disadvantages and modest conflict with development plan policies.
The adverse impacts of the development, comprising modest locational disadvantages and conflict with development plan policies, would not significantly and demonstrably outweigh its benefits in meeting specialist housing need for older people, delivering construction and employment benefits, and reducing vehicle movements from a previously developed site, when considered against the Framework; the presumption in favour of sustainable development therefore applied.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy C1Policy CS3Policy CS18Policy CS1Policy AS-Inf2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 137Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed18 September 20266011498Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®