Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 June 20253303034

153 Pizien Well Road, Wateringbury, MAIDSTONE, ME18 5HX

retrospective application for change of use of land to residential amenity land

Authority
Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Jones R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would amount to inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, relevant development plan policies, the effect on openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The failure to meet criterion (b) of paragraph 155 of the Framework (demonstrable unmet need) combined with the substantial weight applied to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 110, 115, 143, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy CP3, Core Strategy Policy CP1, Core Strategy Policy CP14

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.