Planning appeal decision
Land off Micklewood Lane, Penkridge, South Staffordshire, ST19 5SD
change of use of land to use as residential caravan site for 4 gypsy families, including stationing of 6 caravans, laying of hardstanding and erection of communal amenity building
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Dyer S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the change of use to a gypsy and traveller site is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area and Mansty Wood which is an ancient woodland.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The cumulative weight of the considerations in favour of the appellant did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt (openness) combined with the significant harm to character and appearance and the moderate weight attached to intentional unauthorised development, so very special circumstances were not established.
The significant/substantial harm to Green Belt openness and to character and appearance, combined with moderate weight against the appeal for intentional unauthorised development, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight attached to unmet gypsy and traveller need, lack of supply, absence of alternative accommodation and personal circumstances including the best interests of the children; the balance therefore tipped against allowing the appeal.
Framework references: 148
Plan policies cited: Core Policy 2, Policy GB1, Policy H6, Policy EQ1, Policy EQ4, Policy EQ11, Policy EQ12
Judgments cited: Lisa Smith v SSLUHC [2022] EWCA Civ 1391
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®