Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 August 20233303603

Marlpost Meadows Bonfire Hill, Southwater, HORSHAM, RH13 9BU

construction of chalet style detached dwelling

Authority
Horsham District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Parker R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site represents a suitable location for housing, having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Arun Valley Special Protection Area, Special Area of Conservation and Ramsar site, with particular regard to water neutrality
  • whether any harm in respect of the above issues would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme

What decided it

The housing land supply shortfall triggered the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d), and the water neutrality mitigation measures secured by condition eliminated the only potential reason for refusal under the Framework's protective policies, allowing the modest housing benefit to outweigh the conflict with the development plan.

The conflict with HDPF Policy 26 was given limited weight due to the out-of-date housing boundaries; the modest but cumulatively significant housing benefit, the site's reasonable accessibility to services, and its status as previously developed land outweighed any adverse impacts, with no Framework protective policies providing a clear reason for refusal once water neutrality was secured.

Framework references: 11, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy 26, Policy 4, Policy 3, Policy 2, Policy 31, Policy 37, Policy 40

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.