Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 November 20243303778

Bushy Hill Communication Station, Edwins Hall Road, Woodham Ferrers, Chelmsford, CM3 8RU

permanent retention of mobile home to provide accommodation for security guard on basis of 24 hours per day for 365 days per year

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Major offices/R&D/light industry
Inspector
Ghafoor A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: Whether the stationing of a mobile home for security accommodation ancillary to Class B1 operations has been in continuous use for 10 years without significant interruption to qualify for a certificate of lawful use.
  • Appeal B: Whether the permanent retention of a mobile home to provide 24-hour security guard accommodation is acceptable in principle and in accordance with the development plan.
  • Appeal C: Whether a new footpath link to the pre-existing footpath to the south of the site would be acceptable in terms of visual impact and public benefit.

What decided it

Appeal A was decided by the appellant's failure to prove 10 years of continuous use; Appeal B by the conflict with spatial strategy and failure to demonstrate necessity; Appeal C by the visual harm to the countryside without public benefit.

Plan policies cited: Policy S7, Strategic Policy S11, Policy DM10, Policy DM23

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.