Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld14 May 20243303842

322 Allenby Road, SOUTHALL, UB1 2HR

without planning permission, the construction of an additional rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moss J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • For the material change of use: the effect on living conditions of occupiers of the appeal site regarding size of units, garden space and outlook; the effect on living conditions of neighbouring occupiers; whether the development results in inconveniences for road users and prejudice to highway safety from additional parking demand; whether sufficient cycle parking provision is made.
  • For the boiler storage structure and Third Extension: the effect on character and appearance of the site and surrounding area.

What decided it

The material change of use creates accommodation that fails to meet London Plan Policy D6 housing quality standards and causes unacceptable harm to both the living conditions of the occupiers and neighbouring amenity, which cannot be overcome by conditions or material considerations.

Framework references: 3.6.2, 3.6.5

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy D6, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy T6, London Plan Policy T6.1, London Plan Policy T5, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy 3.5, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy 7A, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy 7B, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy 7D, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy 7.4, Ealing Development Plan Documents Policy BP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.