Planning appeal decision
1 & 2 Heydon Cottages , Church Road, Windlesham, GU20 6BL
Planning appeal 3303914 at 1 & 2 Heydon Cottages , Church Road, Windlesham, GU20 6BL (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 7 August 2023 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of existing single storey extensions and erection of a two storey side extension to both properties
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- GU20 6BL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development within the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the locally listed buildings and the character and appearance of the area, with due regard to the location of the site in the Church Road, Windlesham CA
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety with due regard to the provision of off-street car parking and turning
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties with particular reference to privacy
- If the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether or not the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with disproportionate additions to the original buildings, harms the openness of the Green Belt, and causes less than substantial harm to the conservation area and non-designated heritage asset which is not outweighed by public benefits, and no very special circumstances exist to justify approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM9Policy DM17Policy WNP 2.1Policy WNP 2.2Policy WNP 3.1Policy WNP 4.2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed18 September 202660121062 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Dismissed1 May 20263376162Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
- Allowed17 April 20263374712Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
- Allowed16 April 20266002682Holly Lodge, Catena Rise, Lightwater, Surrey, GU18 5RD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®