Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 May 20233303979

Area of Footway, Brighton Road, Oakhill, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 5BU

Planning appeal 3303979 at Area of Footway, Brighton Road, Oakhill, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 5BU (Horsham District Council) was dismissed on 10 May 2023 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

Proposed telecommunications installation: Proposed ‘slim line’ phase 8 monopole c/w wraparound cabinet at base, 3no. additional ancillary equipment cabinets and associated ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Phillips B
Postcode
RH13 5BU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, and whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposed monopole would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area that was not outweighed by the need for the installation or the inadequately justified absence of suitable alternative sites.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 32Policy 33
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Horsham District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed29 October 20266008830
    Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266007051
    Bentley House, North Heath Lane Industrial Estate, North Heath Lane, Horsham, RH12 5QE
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266012640
    The Fords, Bonfire Hill, Southwater, RH13 9BU
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266008205
    Barnards Nursery, Rock Road, Washington, RH20 3BH
  5. Allowed12 October 20266011680
    Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.