Planning appeal decision
Telecommunications Site Cornerstone 303084, Footway at Bromford Road, Ne of Junction With Radstock Ave, Birmingham, B36 8HJ
Planning appeal 3304022 at Telecommunications Site Cornerstone 303084, Footway at Bromford Road, Ne of Junction With Radstock Ave, Birmingham, B36 8HJ (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 13 December 2022 by Inspector Worley E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby residential properties having particular regard to outlook.
the installation of a 17.5m monopole supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. transmission dishes, 2 no. equipment cabinets and ancillary development thereto including the installation of a GPS module and 3 no. RRHs (Remote Radio Heads)
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Worley E
- Postcode
- B36 8HJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of nearby residential properties having particular regard to outlook
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed monopole and ancillary equipment would cause no harm to either the living conditions of nearby residents or the character and appearance of the area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy DM2Policy DM16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed29 October 20266012986Land at the Rear of 79 Church Hill Road, Birmingham, B20 3PA
- Dismissed29 October 20266011902Wagamama, 51 Edgbaston Street, Birmingham, B5 4QL
- Dismissed27 October 2026601366222 Wash Lane, Birmingham, B25 8SB
- Dismissed22 October 2026601550360 Mildenhall Road, Great Barr, Birmingham, B42 2PQ
- Dismissed22 October 202660151469Brittan Close, Birmingham, B34 7NB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®