Planning appeal decision
Land to the West of Lake End Road, Formerly Known As Orchard Herbs, Dorney, SL4 6QS
Planning appeal 3304031 at Land to the West of Lake End Road, Formerly Known As Orchard Herbs, Dorney, SL4 6QS (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was dismissed on 11 October 2024 by Inspector Freer P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
Use as a builders yard and storage of commercial vehicles, equipment and building materials. Summary
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Freer P
- Postcode
- SL4 6QS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development, if any, on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the use prejudices conditions of highway safety
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The cumulative and substantial/great weight harms to Green Belt openness, character and appearance, and heritage assets, reinforced by the appellant's long history of intentional unauthorised development, were not clearly outweighed by the limited economic and biodiversity benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.
substantial harm to Green Belt openness, significant harm to character and appearance, great weight harm to heritage assets, moderate harm to living conditions, and significant weight attached to intentional unauthorised development were not clearly outweighed by only limited weight economic benefits and limited weight biodiversity net gain, so the harm by reason of inappropriateness and other harm was not clearly outweighed and very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy GB4Policy EP3Policy 8Policy 10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 180Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
- Judgments
- Young v SSE [1983] 2 AC 66; Panton and Farmer v SSETR (1999) 78 P&CR 186; Beach v SSTER [2001] EWHC (Admin) 381; Jennings Motors Ltd v SSE [1982] QB 541; Nicholson v SSE (1998) 76 P 7 CR 191; R (Ocado Retail Ltd) v London Borough of Islington [2021] EWHC 1509 (Admin); Swale BC v FSS [2006] JPL 886
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed9 September 20263345670Link Park Heathrow, Thorney Mill Road, West Drayton, UB7 7EZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
- Notice upheld3 September 20263345455Willow Tree Farm Love Lane, Iver, SL0 9QZ
- Allowed1 September 20263354729The Park, Wexham Road, Slough, Buckinghamshire, SL2 5QR
- Notice varied and upheld26 August 20263376241The Woollets , Cherry Tree Lane, Fulmer, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6JE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®