Planning appeal decision
Land lying to the south west side of Coldharbour Farm, Lingfield Common Road, Lingfield, RH7 6BZ
without planning permission, the erection of metal gates and fencing, which exceed 2 metres in height in part, enclosing the northern part of the site in the approximate position outlined in brown on the attached plan, and associated with the use of the land for the storage and distribution of portable toilets
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Howell M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
- The effect of the development on the setting of heritage assets, namely Paris Farm and Coldharbour Farm Listed Buildings (Grade II).
- The effect of the development on ecology and biodiversity, including the ecological integrity of the Lingfield Nature Reserve, Blindly Heath Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and the Lingfield Cernes SSSI.
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of Paris Farm Cottage, Yew Tree Cottage and Paris Farm with regard to outlook and privacy.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The harm to the openness of the Green Belt (compounded by character, heritage and ecological harms) was not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits put forward, so very special circumstances were not established.
The limited public benefits (secure site for animals, modest economic benefit) did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to Green Belt openness, together with harm to character and appearance, heritage setting and uncertain ecological impact, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
Framework references: 142, 143, 153, 154, 155, 193, 215
Plan policies cited: DP7, DP9, DP10, DP13, DP17, DP19, DP20, CSP18, CSP21
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®