Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 October 20223304615

6 Heatherlea Gardens, Sunderland, SR3 1YQ

Planning appeal 3304615 at 6 Heatherlea Gardens, Sunderland, SR3 1YQ (Sunderland City Council) was dismissed on 20 October 2022 by Inspector Symmons J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

a 2 storey rear gable extension with a single storey rear hipped roof extension, replacing existing single storey hip roof. Single- storey side extension to mirror existing single-storey side extension on the opposite side. Loft conversion with Velux roof lights and accompanying internal alterations

Authority
Sunderland City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Symmons J
Postcode
SR3 1YQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupants of the neighbouring properties in terms of outlook and privacy

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area and significantly increase the overbearing impact on neighbouring properties' outlook, contrary to Policy BH1, and these harms could not be outweighed by the appellants' aims to create a modern family home or energy efficiency benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BH1 of Sunderland City Council's Core Strategy and Development Plan 2015-2033Sunderland City Council's Development Management Supplementary Planning Document 2021

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

58 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sunderland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed5 October 20266006514
    1 Grayling Court, Doxford International, Sunderland, SR3 3XE
  2. Allowed25 September 20266004934
    105 Wellburn Road, Washington, NE37 1DD
  3. Planning permission granted15 September 20263368726
    47 Roker Park Road, Sunderland, SR6 9PL
  4. Dismissed14 September 20266011401
    1 Rothbury, Sunderland, SR2 0BE
  5. Allowed10 September 20266010644
    2 Crowther Road, Crowther, Washington, NE38 0AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.