Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 November 20233304638

292 - 294 Plashet Grove, East Ham, London, E6 1DQ

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Major retail and services
Inspector
Russell J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the trench represented a material operation for the purposes of s56 of the TCPA90
  • Whether condition 3 is a condition precedent and what that means for the 2019 permission
  • If the trench was dug in breach of a condition precedent, whether that means development took place without planning permission

What decided it

The level and type of vehicular movements required during demolition and construction, particularly the manoeuvring of 30-tonne lorries into the site from Plashet Grove, would create unacceptable highway safety risks that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level, and condition 3 was necessarily and clearly justifiably imposed as a pre-commencement condition given the site's constraints and sensitive location.

Plan policies cited: London Plan Policy T1, London Plan Policy T4, London Plan Policy T7, Newham Local Plan Policy INF1, Newham Local Plan Policy SP8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.