Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld23 February 20243304750

The Land Known As Land At 172-174 Collier Row Lane, And At The Rear Of 172-174 Collier Row Lane, Romford, RM5 3EZ

Planning appeal 3304750 at The Land Known As Land At 172-174 Collier Row Lane, And At The Rear Of 172-174 Collier Row Lane, Romford, RM5 3EZ (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 23 February 2024 by Inspector Fleming D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

without planning permission, the material change of use of the land to use for a mixed-use of a retail shop or retail unit within Class E of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 as amended, dwellings within Class C3 of the same Order and land used for vehicle storage within Class B8 of the same Order

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Fleming D
Postcode
RM5 3EZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether there is sufficient space to manoeuvre vehicles without detriment to other users of the shared space
  • whether the development results in an increased risk of flooding
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, having regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The development is harmful to the character and appearance of the area, being incongruous and inconsistent with the established suburban character and contrary to Policies 26 and 27 of the Havering Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 26Policy 27Policy 10Policy 23Policy 24Policy 32Policy 13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

296 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  2. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL
  3. Planning permission granted29 July 20263367840
    5A Myrtle Road, Romford, RM3 8XS
  4. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  5. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.