Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 March 20233304790

26 Shepherd's Bush Road, London, W6 7PJ

Planning appeal 3304790 at 26 Shepherd's Bush Road, London, W6 7PJ (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was allowed on 16 March 2023 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether conditions 11, 12 and 13 are necessary and reasonable to ensure that the development does not harm air quality and the existing amenities of neighbouring residential properties by adding to on-street car parking stress in the area.

Change of use of lower ground and upper ground floor from restaurant (Class E) to 1 x 3 bedroom self-contained flat (Class C3); replacement of shopfront, entrance doors and forecourt alterations; infilling of void; window and door replacements; replacement of railings to roof terrace; formation of bin store; removal of extraction flue

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Jones RE
Postcode
W6 7PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether conditions 11, 12 and 13 are necessary and reasonable to ensure that the development does not harm air quality and the existing amenities of neighbouring residential properties by adding to on-street car parking stress in the area

What decided it

The Inspector's site observations of available parking spaces in nearby streets, combined with the Council's failure to provide firm evidence of parking stress levels, demonstrated that the conditions were not necessary to prevent unacceptable harm to neighbouring amenities or highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T4Policy T6Policy CC10Policy T1Key Principle TR3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 799 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 August 20266010167
    15 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266010163
    13 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  3. Dismissed21 August 20266009772
    Pavement Outside 297 King Street, Hammersmith, W6 9NH
  4. Dismissed15 June 20266006413
    110-112 Uxbridge Road, London, W12 8LR
  5. Allowed7 May 20266004923
    205 Munster Road, London, SW6 6BX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.